Loading...
Biosafety Virtual Library Resources (VLR)
  |  
| 
last updated: 27 Mar 2025

General information
Africa and zero hunger agenda: genome editing policy landscape, challenges and opportunities.
EN
Olalekan Akinbo, Bongani Nkhabindze, Josephine Amedu, Rufus Ebegba, Agnes Asagbra, Billy Omboki Ratemo,Susan Angira Dada, Anne Muia, Roy Mugiira, Lilian Chimphepo, Leeford Oko Wristberg, Mathurin W. Rouamba, Koussao Some, Valter N. A. Nuaila,Alsácia Atanásio, Olufunke Bolatito Shittu,Charles Oluwaseun Adetunji, Loubna Hamidi, Elinasi Monga,Silas Obukosia, Muyiwa Seyi Adegbaju, Samuel Acheampong and Estherine Fotabong
EN
National Biosafety Authority-Kenya (NBA)   BCH-ORG-SCBD-115225-3
  • Government agency (National/Federal)
National Biosafety Management Agency (NBMA)   BCH-ORG-SCBD-115160-2
  • Government agency (National/Federal)
African Union Development Agency (AUDA-NEPAD)   BCH-ORG-SCBD-266924-1
  • Inter-governmental organization (IGO)
- Organization: National Biosafety Authority (NBA) | BCH-CON-GH-243615-1
Organization:
National Biosafety Authority (NBA)
Government agency (National/Federal)
P. O. Box WY 2287, Kwabenya
Accra,
, Ghana
Phone: +233 20 8163038,
Fax:
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
EN
2025-03
EN
Open access
EN
Access to the resource(s)
Information on the content of the resource
Abstract: Africa has historically struggled to adopt innovative agricultural technologies, which has significantly hindered efforts to ensure food security and improve livelihoods over the past century. A major obstacle in this regard has been the persistent skepticism surrounding the potential benefits of agricultural biotechnology. The challenges contributing to this skepticism include a notable knowledge gap among stakeholders, widespread technophobia, or fear of technology, as well as inconsistencies with global agreements such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Although these challenges are not exclusive to Africa, they disproportionately impact the continent, making the need for effective solutions even more urgent. This paper investigates the national government policy landscape in five African countries that are poised to create a regulatory environment conducive to deploying genome editing technology for improved agricultural productivity. This exploration aligns with the continental agricultural policy initiatives, notably the “CAADP Malabo Declaration” and the soon-to-be-signed “CAADP Kampala Declaration.” Aligning with the African Union’s continental agenda on agricultural transformation, as outlined in the Malabo Declaration and other key documents, is crucial for adopting innovative agricultural technologies like genome editing. Such alignment becomes increasingly critical for realizing the objectives set forth in the post-Malabo Declaration, with the Kampala Declaration playing a vital role in its implementation. This cohesive approach will not only foster agricultural innovation but also expedite development across the continent, addressing the pressing needs of food security and livelihoods in Africa.
EN
  • Burkina Faso
  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Malawi
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • United States of America
  • Africa - all regions
Keywords for facilitating searching for information in the clearing-houses
  • GBF-T17. Strengthen biosafety and distribute benefits of biotechnology
Yes
  • BCH-LMO-SCBD-115277-2 Living Modified Organism MON-8746Ø-4 × MON-89Ø34-3 - TELA® Maize
    Bayer Crop Science Company, African Agricultural Technology Foundation and Institute of Agricultural Research | Resistance to antibiotics (Kanamycin), Resistance to diseases and pests (Insects, Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths)), Selectable marker genes and reporter genes, Tolerance to abiotic stress (Cold / Heat, Drought)
  • BCH-LMO-SCBD-114444-2 Living Modified Organism AAT-7Ø9AA-4 - Pod Borer-resistant cowpea
    African Agricultural Technology Foundation and Institute of Agricultural Research | Resistance to antibiotics (Kanamycin), Resistance to diseases and pests (Insects, Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths))
No
No
Additional Information
Article keywords:  food security, genome editing, technophobia, policy landscape, agriculture biotechnology 
EN